Quantum redactiones paginae "Disputatio:Propulsorium" differant

Summarium vacuum
:::::The thing is, that form can't be right. If we were sure what form he intended, we could cite him for it -- but I, for one, can't feel sure what form he intended. It's lost, somewhere between him, his proof-reading and his printer. If we put that form in, we'd just be saying "Look, everybody! There's some kind of mistake in Traupman's book here!" Which wouldn't help anybody ... <font face="Gill Sans">[[Usor:Andrew Dalby|Andrew]]<font color="green">[[Disputatio Usoris:Andrew Dalby| Dalby]]</font></font> 20:54, 30 Augusti 2013 (UTC)
::::::Got it! Thanks as always.[[Usor:Jondel|Jondel]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:Jondel|disputatio]]) 09:52, 31 Augusti 2013 (UTC)
:::::::Dunno about the 3rd edition that was cited, but Traupman has "propulsor" in my 2nd edition. —[[Usor:Mycēs|Mucius Tever]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:Mycēs|disputatio]]) 01:13, 7 Septembris 2013 (UTC)
2 533