Quantum redactiones paginae "Disputatio:Tabella tributaria" differant
Content deleted Content added
Linea 16:
::I replaced "Circa 1940 primum adhibita est in Civitatibus Foederatis ad numerum crescentem possessorum autocineti ad vendendum alimentum petroleicum" with ''Circa 1940 primum adhibita est in Civitatibus Foederatis ad alimentum petroleicum vendendum numero crescenti possessorum autocineti'', as I fancy the meaning is 'It was initially used in the U.S. in order to sell fuel to a growing number of car owners'. Recte intellegi? --[[Usor:Poecus|Poecus]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:Poecus|disputatio]]) 13:48, 24 Aprilis 2013 (UTC)
:::Yes. Is Numerum is wrong? Or numero is just better ( numerum is correct but bad latin?) (Sold to numerum --accusative--)[[Usor:Jondel|Jondel]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:Jondel|disputatio]]) 14:50, 24 Aprilis 2013 (UTC)
::::Problem is, I don't know if ''vendo'' can be followed by ad + accusative: note that English ''to somebody'' is often translated in Latin with dative (numero). Unfortunately, I can't find many examples on the web. At the moment, I have ''...quorum omnium capita regi Cotto vendidisti'', Cic. Pis. 34, 84. Maybe someone else could confirm.--[[Usor:Poecus|Poecus]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:Poecus|disputatio]]) 08:34, 25 Aprilis 2013 (UTC)
| |||