Quantum redactiones paginae "Disputatio:Carolinum" differant

:Yes, the noun on which the [http://www.catholic-hierarchy.org/diocese/dchan.html diocese] name is based must be ''Carolina''. This is a confusing name because it's so close to the name of the state! If we move to it, I would propose the title '''Carolina (urbs Carolinae Septentrionalis)'''. But maybe someone did have a source for '''Carlotta'''? If so, now's the time to say so! <font face="Gill Sans">[[Usor:Andrew Dalby|Andrew]]<font color="green">[[Disputatio Usoris:Andrew Dalby| Dalby]]</font></font> 14:23, 18 Iulii 2007 (UTC)

::Interestingly, Egger doesn't have Charlotte at all. Burke (''A Hand-List of Latin Place Names with their Modern Equivalents''), however, gives ''Carolinum''. --[[Usor:Iustinus|Iustinus]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:Iustinus|disputatio]]) 07:00, 8 Februarii 2013 (UTC)