Quantum redactiones paginae "Disputatio Usoris:Stattloch1" differant

sure!
(→‎et...: ok, bene)
(sure!)
 
Gratias ob laborem tuum! Opus fuit nobis has paginas creare, gratias ut incepisti!--[[Usor:Ioshus Rocchio|Ioshus]] <small><sup>[[Disputatio Usoris:Ioshus Rocchio|(disp)]]</sup></small> 12:31, 15 Martii 2007 (UTC)
 
:It is a pleasure, Ioshus... I just wonder why I waited so long to start them! --[[Usor:Stattloch1|Alexis Hellmer]] 12:35, 15 Martii 2007 (UTC)
 
::Credo paginam ''[[Malachites]]'' esse numero 12,000 in Vicipaedia Latina! <font face="Gill Sans">[[Usor:Andrew Dalby|Andrew]]<font color="green">[[Disputatio Usoris:Andrew Dalby| Dalby]]</font></font> 13:59, 15 Martii 2007 (UTC)
 
:::Gaudeamus igitur! Vicipaedia nostra est quotidie maior et utilior!--[[Usor:Stattloch1|Alexis Hellmer]] 14:07, 15 Martii 2007 (UTC)
 
==Gotofredus==
Is there a reason you've been changing Mr. Gotofredus's name from ''Ioannes'' to ''Iohannes''? DO you have a source on it, or is it just because he's German? I confess that when I wrote those pages I had to guess how he spelled his name, because he's just given as "Jo." on the [http://www.uni-mannheim.de/mateo/camenaref/avity/avity1/jpg/stavit0003.jpg title page]. --[[Usor:Iustinus|Iustinus]] 01:20, 16 Martii 2007 (UTC)
 
:OK, good. The inconsistancy would be my fault, for the reasons given above, and so going with the more german form is as good a principle as any. Sorry I was nervous. I just get tired of people changing already researched historical names for specious reasons, and Ioannes/Iohannes is another such thing that comes up again and again. But obviously that wasn't the case here. --[[Usor:Iustinus|Iustinus]] 16:44, 16 Martii 2007 (UTC)
:Sorry, I didn't mean to do anything wrong. There where links in ''Vicipaedia'' to both Ioannes and Iohannes (vide [[Usor:Iustinus/Scribenda]] Titulos Iaponicos) and since there is no article at all, I thought I could start one (which I haven't yet :S)... and I thought Iohannes would fit, because he was German. What do you think? Greetings --[[Usor:Stattloch1|Alexis Hellmer]] 07:14, 16 Martii 2007 (UTC)
 
::OK, good. The inconsistancy would be my fault, for the reasons given above, and so going with the more german form is as good a principle as any. Sorry I was nervous. I just get tired of people changing already researched historical names for specious reasons, and Ioannes/Iohannes is another such thing that comes up again and again. But obviously that wasn't the case here. --[[Usor:Iustinus|Iustinus]] 16:44, 16 Martii 2007 (UTC)
 
==[[Tlaxcala]] and [[Yucatanis]]==
 
::[[OK]], bene. Quippe credidi errorem esse. Eam delevi. Tua poesis...Anglice, Hispanice, an Latine scripta? Legere velim.--[[Usor:Ioshus Rocchio|Ioshus]] <small><sup>[[Disputatio Usoris:Ioshus Rocchio|(disp)]]</sup></small> 15:30, 12 Aprilis 2007 (UTC)
 
:::Anglice et Latine poesin meam scribo, sed Hispanice praesertim. Haud scio an digna legendi non sint poematia mea, sed possum tibi mittere nonnulla ut ipse iudices exempla.
1 252

recensiones