Quantum redactiones paginae "Disputatio:Principatus Monoeci" differant
Content deleted Content added
m →Adjectives and nomen gentis: addidi |
|||
Linea 30:
:::I haven't understood, can we delete the adjective ''Monoecus''? [[Usor:Franciesse|'''<span style="color:green">Fran</span><span style="color:white">ci</span><span style="color:red">esse</span>''']] 19:01, 5 Ianuarii 2013 (UTC)
::::Yes, it seems that we can. We have no citation for "Monoecus" as "nomen incolarum" (the quote from Hofmann has been misunderstood). Also we have no citation for "Monoecus" as "adiectivum". As I said above, it ''is'' a Greek adjective originally, but as adjective it doesn't mean "of Monaco", it means "living alone". We can find citations for "Monoecensis" as adjective -- see google. I don't think we have any word for "nomen incolarum" as yet -- but since "Monoecensis" exists, it would be acceptable in that sense. <font face="Gill Sans">[[Usor:Andrew Dalby|Andrew]]<font color="green">[[Disputatio Usoris:Andrew Dalby| Dalby]]</font></font> 19:59, 5 Ianuarii 2013 (UTC)
:::::How has the quote from Hofmann been misunderstood? It says quite clearly: MONOECUS, incolis ''Mònaco''[[http://www.uni-mannheim.de/mateo/camenaref/hofmann/hof3/s0203b.html]]. How would you interpret this, other than to the citizens of Monaco (i.e. of the cit.)? I may have missed something.--[[Usor:Nicolaus Augurinus|Nicolaus Augurinus]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:Nicolaus Augurinus|disputatio]]) 20:20, 5 Ianuarii 2013 (UTC)
== "Lingua Anglica hic non nobis interest" ==
| |||