:::::::Thanks for solving that in the case of William of Tyre... I didn't like not knowing which form to use for him.
:::::::As for Bach, as I recall, years ago when I first looked I found a Latin source, but it turned out to be a different Iohannes Sebastianus Bach... or am I thinking of Beethoven? Anyway, if I noted it in Wikipedia I can't seem to find it now. --[[Usor:Iustinus|Iustinus]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:Iustinus|disputatio]]) 20:03, 24 Septembris 2012 (UTC)
:::::::I know he ''taught'' Latin, as it was one of his duties in Leipzig, at least before employing someone to to do so for him, so I would be surprised if there weren't at least ''something'' out there with his Johann Hancock on it in Latin. Looking into it. -- [[Usor:Ioscius|Ioscius]] <sup>'''[[Disputatio Usoris:Ioscius|∞]]'''</sup> 20:05, 24 Septembris 2012 (UTC)
::::::For categories (I create a lot of them) I tend to lean slightly towards consistency and a standard form where that seems possible, because you can't have redirects in category namespace, so the more predictable they are, the better. For that reason I would not have objected to the change in the category name to [[:Categoria:Ioannes Sebastianus Bach]]. But I may be going beyond consensus in this!
::::::In main namespace I agree with Anne that consistency doesn't matter so much because redirects are easy. <font face="Gill Sans">[[Usor:Andrew Dalby|Andrew]]<font color="green">[[Disputatio Usoris:Andrew Dalby| Dalby]]</font></font> 13:28, 24 Septembris 2012 (UTC)