Quantum redactiones paginae "Disputatio:Coitus oralis" differant

Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
No edit summary
Linea 30:
 
::::::::::Right, and I don't.--[[Usor:Ioshus Rocchio|Ioshus]] <small><sup>[[Disputatio Usoris:Ioshus Rocchio|(disp)]]</sup></small> 02:10, 8 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
:::::::::::See and that's where we differ because you think that graphic images should be covered under free speech, and that NOTHING should be censored, while I think that that (the displaying of such images) was never the founding father's intention, and that such images can be legitimately censored. However, as I said, before to hide is not to remove, and therefore not really censorship, it is just more libertarian in that it allows each person to decide what he wants to see, and doesn't force someone else's view on him. Remember that saying about each persons rights only extending until they violate someone elses? Well this violates no ones. Anyways, I gotta go - log off. But if you want to reply I'll be glad to continue this discussion when I get back. [[Usor:Alexanderr|Alexanderr]] 02:16, 8 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
 
== Is ''cunnilingus'' OK as a Latin word? ==
Revertere ad "Coitus oralis".