Quantum redactiones paginae "Disputatio:Actus sexuales" differant

Content deleted Content added
Linea 37:
:::Wait, Iacobus, are you saying that you know of Latin versions of the Kama Sutra? Cause I sure don't! But even if you do, surely we should start with the ones that are actually in the Latin tradition?
:::Oh, the the actual word for "position" is not, of course, ''positio''. J. N. Adams (poor J. N. Adams, he's written a whole bunch of excellent books on Latin, but if you say his name, no one thinks of any book but ''The Latin Sexual Vocabulary'') repeatedly uses ''schema'', which is what I would have used had I written this article. On the other hand I'm pretty sure I've seen something less graecanic (and hense pedantic) in use somewhere. Can't remember what though. --[[Usor:Iustinus|Iustinus]] 18:44, 4 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
:::And I don't know whether or not this is the "names of the positions" article, but this is already a major chunk of the text, and, as they say, "If you're gonna do it, do it right." --[[Usor:Iustinus|Iustinus]] 18:50, 4 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
 
== link ==
Revertere ad "Actus sexuales".