Quantum redactiones paginae "Disputatio:Actus sexuales" differant

::::::The news about Florida is alarming, because the executive & legistative branches of the state's government are controlled by a party that in recent decades (as opposed to the days of its founding) has often proved hostile to liberty. That's a POV, and this isn't the place to discuss it; but what's relevant here is that if Florida-based wikipedias push contemporary Floridian "community standards" too far, they run the risk of getting shut down, or at least being forced to move to a freer state or country. ¶ As for this image: I'm a native of Florida, and in churches there I've seen stained-glass windows that show more flesh than the image disputed here—and in living color. As anyone who has looked at Western art knows, the ''obscenity'' of the death of Saint Sebastian, a man ordinarily depicted naked or nearly so, undergoing ''torture'' by being shot full of arrows in not-immediately-fatal places (so he'll ''suffer'' more) is a commonplace in religious—and therefore uncensored—imagery. Images of a crucifixion, a horrifically painful execution in progress, usually of a naked or near-naked man, adorn many churches, and during religious services are even brandished by functionaries. So much for depictions of ''pain.'' How much ''less'' equitable must be the urge to censor ''pleasure'' ! [[Usor:IacobusAmor|IacobusAmor]] 13:46, 4 Februarii 2007 (UTC)