Quantum redactiones paginae "Disputatio:Actus sexuales" differant
Content deleted Content added
m movit Disputatio:Activitates eroticae ad Disputatio:Actus Sexuales: Omnes actus sexuales non sunt erotici |
|||
Linea 3:
::No, it isn't, except that something erotic needn't be ''explicitly'' sexual (in form); the present illustration, however, is so exceedingly tame that (in my opinion) it's hardly worth viewing, and certainly not worth hiding. [[Usor:IacobusAmor|IacobusAmor]] 00:38, 3 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
:::It is hardly tame, even if illustrated. And should be hidden. [[Usor:Alexanderr|Alexanderr]] 18:37, 3 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
::::Read my opinion at [[Vicipaedia:Imagines_in_disputatione#Activitates_eroticae]]. --[[Usor:Rolandus|Rolandus]] 18:52, 3 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
''Vide etiam [[Vicipaedia:Imagines in disputatione]]. --[[Usor:Rolandus|Rolandus]] 09:56, 3 Februarii 2007 (UTC)''
| |||