Quantum redactiones paginae "Disputatio:Mahometus Muradus Ildan" differant

 
:::::::Orland, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mehmet_Murat_%C4%B0ldan&diff=103606453&oldid=103603247 this] edit by you in [[:en]] was not correct. The summary says ''reverted an attempt by the author to hide the numerous interwikis undergoing deletion process'' but it seems that you additionally destroyed an attempt to cleanup the article. Later the article has been blanked again. And restored again. Yes, an anonymous user (the same as on [[:en]]) removed interwiki links here as well. I have reverted his edits and blocked him. And, as I said, I was sceptical whether the provided information is true at all. But after all it seems, that for us it is ok to keep this article. I'd like to thank you for having informed us about the issue. However, even when the article will be deleted on all other Wikipedias, we might just cleanup the interwiki links and keep the article. I have this feeling. The promotion action does not count. Calling it a ''self''-promotion is curious. Nobody can know whether Mehmet knows about this case at all, although someone claimed the opposite. Ok, the promotion was bad, but the reaction smells bad as well. --[[Usor:Rolandus|Rolandus]] 17:39, 27 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)
 
::::::::Orland, the ''entire'' text of this article (other than footnotelike material) is "Maomethes Morathes İldan (natus Ancyrae 16 Maii 1965) est scriptor Turcus." To which part of it do you object? You've acknowledged that the man has a name, and so was presumably born ("natus"), and you've conceded that he's a Turkish writer. That leaves in dispute only "Ancyrae 16 Maii 1965." What's wrong there? ¶ Yes, it would be splendid for Vicipaedia to have articles on more Turkish writers. Feel free to write them! As to İldan's famelessness, if Vicipaedia can sustain an article on Crates of Mallos (an author probably less read even than obscure Turkish scribblers, self-promoting or not), it can surely survive having an article on İldan. If this article, however, is a hoax, then of course it should be deleted. Do you have proof that the Turkish writer İldan does not exist? ¶ As to the point about what other wikis are doing: so what? must all wikipedias march in lock-step? can't each wikipedia have unique articles? At the moment, Vicipaedia's article [[Fafa]], for example, seems to be the only one of its kind—in der Welt. And why not? Every comprehensive & heterogeneous project will have strengths & weaknesses, highlights & blind spots. [[Usor:IacobusAmor|IacobusAmor]] 18:05, 27 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)
86 898

recensiones