Quantum redactiones paginae "Disputatio:Mahometus Muradus Ildan" differant

::::I've looked around a bit more now. Yes, it was self-promotion. I think I should take Ildan's correspondence course. [[:no:Bruker:Orland|no:Orland]] was surely right to urge the speedy deletion of the English Wikipedia articles about all Ildan's individual books. However, I feel differently about the brief bio articles on all those language Wikipedias (incidentally, it's not true that they are "now deleted from almost every wikipedia" -- though deletion has been proposed on most of them). Ildan is a published and versatile writer with numerous books in Turkish to his credit. The way to balance the coverage of Turkish literature on this and other Wikipedias is to add articles about others, not to delete him. <font face="Gill Sans">[[Usor:Andrew Dalby|A]]<font color="green">[[:en:User:Andrew Dalby|nd]]</font>'''[[:en:User Talk:Andrew Dalby|rew D]]'''<font color="green">[[:en:User:Andrew Dalby/Bibliography|alby]]</font></font> 21:24, 25 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)
:::::You may want to say exactly this in the deletion debate over at en:. I can't say I feel strongly about the larger issue one way or another, but inasmuch as he is a published author, and the article is factually correct, it seems that so long as the Latin is good, we shoudl keep it on la: at least. --[[Usor:Iustinus|Iustinus]] 09:28, 27 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)
::::::Look for more information in my english [[:en:User_talk:Orland#A_statement_in_the_Ildan_case]]. Note also that at least 14 wp-languages until now has delete the spamming Ildan-biography; and note also that three different anonymous ip-adresses this last day has tried to delete from the english article [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mehmet_Murat_%C4%B0ldan&diff=103595932&oldid=103593138] interwiki-links in order to "hide" where deletion debates are ongoing. As stated by a french contributor during this debate "''this guy launched one of the most incredible spam event that I've ever seen on WP''". On the english deletion debate his spamming behaviour is a part of the argument, together with Ildan almost total lack of signifcance [[:en:User:Orland]] / [[:no:Bruker:Orland]] --[[Usor:|]] 16:40, 27 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)
Usor anonymus