Quantum redactiones paginae "Disputatio:Mahometus Muradus Ildan" differant
Content deleted Content added
Linea 25:
::And some ''facts'': I am a literary critic, and have published one book on childrens literature, in norwegian. This single book gives more hits in google ([http://www.google.no/search?sourceid=navclient&hl=no&ie=UTF-8&rls=GGLF,GGLF:1970-01,GGLF:no&q=%22barnas+forfatterleksikon%22]) than his name [http://www.google.no/search?sourceid=navclient&hl=no&ie=UTF-8&rls=GGLF,GGLF:1970-01,GGLF:no&q=%22Mehmet+Murat+%c4%b0ldan%22]; and the odds are even worse if you remove the wikipedia hits [http://www.google.no/search?hl=no&rls=GGLF%2CGGLF%3A1970-01%2CGGLF%3Ano&q=%22Mehmet+Murat+%C4%B0ldan%22+-wikipedia&meta=]. (And of course, this comparision is not completely fair, as www is more common in norway than in turkey, but still) --[[:en:User:Orland|en:Orland]] / [[:no:Bruker:Orland|no:Orland]] --[[Usor:80.232.34.55|80.232.34.55]] 20:36, 25 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)
:::Would someone "in the know" offer an explanation of the politics driving these deletions? Vicipaedia's text appears to be factual, and that's a prime consideration, non? Vicipaedia's text does not seem to contain aggressive self-promotion. If any links do, they can easily be cut. [[Usor:IacobusAmor|IacobusAmor]] 20:44, 25 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)
::Orland, I understand your and your friend's reasons, but I do not vehemently support them. Relevance does not have the highest priority for me, see [[Vicipaedia:Gravitas]]. Accuracy and traceability have a high priority for me. So I deposed my doubts more than 2 months ago (see above) and - frankly speeking - I am not yet satisfied. We are not undemanding here, but we might have a slightly different value system. --[[Usor:Rolandus|Rolandus]] 21:19, 25 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)
| |||