Quantum redactiones paginae "Disputatio:Mahometus Muradus Ildan" differant

::::Re: "wp as a extreme self-pr without any reasonable notability"—looks like he's got several books to his credit, and in several genres, and such an article is accordingly more justifiable than many already in Vicipaedia, non? [[Usor:IacobusAmor|IacobusAmor]] 01:04, 24 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)
:::::You are right and I do not have a problem with less relevant things anyway, however, what I really would like to know is, whether that isn't a joke at all. Google does not help in this case: The books deal with Shakespeare, Galilei, Gandhi, Buddha. Millions of hits. These books might be listed at postion 370 or 1520. I gave up. The references are just two sources, in fact. The one might be a fake as well. I am not sure about the second: How can someone add an entry to www.kultur.gov.tr? Funny situation. --[[Usor:Rolandus|Rolandus]] 01:23, 24 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)
::the english article is obviously lying about his reputation, as it foresees how his reputation will be in the future. Please note the intro statement "''Following his epistolary novel, [[:en:The First Sorrows of Young Werther]], he is regarded as a romantic writer''", when the book in question is due to be published in february this year. This is indeed prophetic skills by the article's author. When the article also states that this unpublished «The First Sorrows of Young Werther» is his ''magnum opus'', we can easily assume that this author is not notable, ''yet''. --[[:en:User:Orland|en:Orland]] 07:56, 24 January 2007 (UTC) --[[:no:Bruker:Orland|no:Orland]] 24. jan 2007 kl. 10:57 (CET)
Usor anonymus