Quantum redactiones paginae "Disputatio:Gastropoda" differant

Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
No edit summary
Linea 3:
::I thought that the compounds ending in the Greek -πους (-ποδος) may be forced into being one-termination adjectives ending in ''-pus'' when Latinized. The online L&S shows "strūthŏpūs, pŏdis, adj." ("sparrow-footed") and that made me think that the word is a one-termination adjective like "vĕtus, ĕris." I can't find a Latinized compound ending in ''-pun'' (representing the Greek element -πουν). For those reasons, I think it might be a good idea to avoid ''gastropun'' and ''cephalopun''. --Diaphanus 09:20, 26 Decembris 2006 (UTC)
:::Well, as I said above, no ''-pus'' adjective is ever attested in the neuter, so far as I can tell, so the fact that you haven't found a ''-pun'' isn't necessarily decisive in and of itself. I would rather avoid ''gastropun'', but I'd rather know for sure that it's the right way to go. --[[Usor:Iustinus|Iustinus]] 01:09, 16 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)
::::I know. I didn't mean to imply it was necessarily decisive! I should have said that it might be better to avoid the absurd forms unless it's really necessary. At any rate, I agree with what you have there on the article (even though we can't find an attestation). --Diaphanus 12:48, 23 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)
:(I should add that this is especially important because I was planning on doing [[cephalopoda]] next) --[[Usor:Iustinus|Iustinus]] 04:14, 7 Septembris 2006 (UTC)
:: No attestations on my part as to whether it's a one-termination or a two-termination form, but I suspect one could in the interim shove the question aside and use ''gastropus, -odis, comm.'' in the singular, leaving the obnoxious singular-less plural for addressing the class of ''mollusca gastropoda'' as a whole. —[[Usor:Mycēs|Myces Tiberinus]] 22:24, 7 Septembris 2006 (UTC)
Revertere ad "Gastropoda".