Quantum redactiones paginae "Disputatio:Alphabetum Graecum" differant
Content deleted Content added
→References: late comment |
|||
Linea 93:
::::::::Please don't forget to add eight above external links like "http://www.tlg.uci.edu/~opoudjis/unicode/" requested above. [[Specialis:Conlationes/91.204.160.75|91.204.160.75]] 19:54, 15 Februarii 2010 (UTC)
:::::::::I think I've done them all now. <font face="Gill Sans">[[Usor:Andrew Dalby|Andrew]]<font color="green">[[Disputatio Usoris:Andrew Dalby| Dalby]]</font></font> 12:57, 16 Februarii 2010 (UTC)
Late response to the questions about uppercase stigma etc. above: With the numeral signs ϛ,ϟ,ϡ, the general practice in modern print is that you simply use the same glyph both in an uppercase and lowercase context, as Andrew rightly says; that's in fact the practice followed in the Migne example linked to above (his uppercase stigma is simply the same as the lowercase, as even more clearly seen at the top of p.518). Some typesetters did have distinct uppercase forms in the 19th century, but they seem to have been quite rare. A few examples are given at [[:en:Digamma]]. An interesting question is whether typesetters who had a capital numeric stigma ever also used it for typesetting textual "Στ" in a mixed-case context. This seems to have been even rarer; I have seen one curious example of "Στίχος" abbreviated as "Ϛίχ." though. [[Usor:Future Perfect at Sunrise|Future Perfect at Sunrise]] 07:10, 11 Octobris 2011 (UTC)
== Edit of 25 June ==
| |||