Vicipaedia

Quantum redactiones paginae "Disputatio:Technologia" differant

Browse history interactively
← Differentia superiorDifferentia proxima →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
No edit summary
Linea 24:
::::::OK then, so long as it's clear to the reader that ''Ingeniarius [&c.] ... NON dicitur qui nova instrumenta ... excogitat'' is also a true sentence! [[Usor:IacobusAmor|IacobusAmor]] 12:24, 26 Iulii 2011 (UTC)
:::::::Thanks, Neander, I'll go with that opinion and not feel guilty after all. <font face="Gill Sans">[[Usor:Andrew Dalby|Andrew]]<font color="green">[[Disputatio Usoris:Andrew Dalby| Dalby]]</font></font> 13:13, 26 Iulii 2011 (UTC)
::::::::Could you explain your intepretation Iacobe? It seems you object to the definition being given of what an engineer does. It is understood, I think, that onecan'st trainingthink doesof nota tellsingle usperson everythingwho wesatisfies do.the Butqui an engineerclause who, say, only edits Vicipaedia isnwouldn't actuallybe acting ascalled an engineer when he does it, but rather he is a writer or editor: he is an engineer only if he participates in the development of newer, better, useful things in a productive way. But maybe I don't understand what you are objecting to.--[[Specialis:Conlationes/123.192.69.44|123.192.69.44]] 13:24, 26 Iulii 2011 (UTC)
Partem novam addere
Receptum de "https://la.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disputatio:Technologia"
Revertere ad "Technologia".