Quantum redactiones paginae "Disputatio:Technologia" differant

Content deleted Content added
Linea 24:
::::::OK then, so long as it's clear to the reader that ''Ingeniarius [&c.] ... NON dicitur qui nova instrumenta ... excogitat'' is also a true sentence! [[Usor:IacobusAmor|IacobusAmor]] 12:24, 26 Iulii 2011 (UTC)
:::::::Thanks, Neander, I'll go with that opinion and not feel guilty after all. <font face="Gill Sans">[[Usor:Andrew Dalby|Andrew]]<font color="green">[[Disputatio Usoris:Andrew Dalby| Dalby]]</font></font> 13:13, 26 Iulii 2011 (UTC)
::::::::Could you explain your intepretation Iacobe? It seems you object to the definition being given of what an engineer does. It is understood, I think, that one's training does not tell us everything we do. But an engineer who, say, only edits Vicipaedia isn't actually acting as an engineer when he does it, but rather he is a writer or editor: he is an engineer only if he participates in the development of newer, better, useful things in a productive way. But maybe I don't understand what you are objecting to.--[[Specialis:Conlationes/123.192.69.44|123.192.69.44]] 13:24, 26 Iulii 2011 (UTC)
Revertere ad "Technologia".