Quantum redactiones paginae "Disputatio:Technologia" differant

In the sentence "Scientificus vel ingeniarius vel inventor dicitur qui nova instrumenta, rationes, et cetera excogitet, faber vel fabricator qui bona producat vel fabricet, mercator vel tabernarius qui vendat, et doctor vel magister qui illam rem rationesque doceat.", I believe the use of the subjunctive is incorrect, it should be indicative since the person called scientist is one who presently or in the past does or did what it says not one who intends or intended to do it.(in oratione "Scientificus vel ingeniarius vel inventor dicitur qui nova instrumenta, rationes, et cetera excogitet, faber vel fabricator qui bona producat vel fabricet, mercator vel tabernarius qui vendat, et doctor vel magister qui illam rem rationesque doceat.", ego non credo modum coniunctivum vim habere, credo autem indicativum, quia scientificus appellatur qui nunc excogitat aut excogitabat non qui excogitet aut excogitaret.)--[[Specialis:Conlationes/123.192.69.44|123.192.69.44]] 23:19, 25 Iulii 2011 (UTC)

:For ''Scientificus vel ingeniarius vel inventor dicitur qui nova instrumenta, rationes, et cetera excogitet,'' one reads: 'Whoever devises new tools, methods, and other things is called a scientist or an engineer or an inventor'. And so on. Wouldn't that require the subjunctive? We don't know who they might be. The subject is ''qui,'' its reference is indefinite (thereby invoking Gildersleeve's section 631.2), and the ''scientificus'' &c. look like predicates of some sort. [[Usor:IacobusAmor|IacobusAmor]] 01:13, 26 Iulii 2011 (UTC)