Quantum redactiones paginae "Disputatio:Victionarium" differant

Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Linea 3:
::Yes, it's an intentionally unusual pronunciation. The logo was made with the pronunciation it has to translate the phonetic transcription on the English logo which was similarly controversial for its unusualness/nonstandardness (e.g. [http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Wiktionary_talk:Wiktionary_Logo]). —[[Usor:Mycēs|Mucius Tever]] 12:38, 22 Novembris 2008 (UTC)
:::Oh, I see! That was indeed a fairly complicated commission. Since I hadn't noticed the problem in two years, I won't be the first to press for change. In any case, classical Latin (like other languages of the past) cannot be reconstructed in phonetic transcription with 100% confidence. Phonemic, yes, maybe. <font face="Gill Sans">[[Usor:Andrew Dalby|Andrew]]<font color="green">[[Disputatio Usoris:Andrew Dalby| Dalby]]</font></font> 13:02, 22 Novembris 2008 (UTC)
:::: Vide etiam disputationem hic: [[:de:Wikipedia:Fragen zur Wikipedia#Wiktschonarium?]] --[[Usor:UV|UV]] 22:01, 27 Martii 2011 (UTC)
Revertere ad "Victionarium".