Quantum redactiones paginae "Disputatio Categoriae:Auctores Latini hodierni" differant
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
Linea 4:
:: What is the distinction between "Auctores Neolatini" and "Auctores Latini hodierni", should we merge these two categories? [[Auctores Neolatini]] redirects to [[Auctores neolatini hodierni]] …? --[[Usor:UV|UV]] 23:00, 22 Martii 2011 (UTC)
:::Good question. Pantocrator pointed out some time ago that "Neolatini" in the sense in which we use it here is against current usage elsewhere. In truth "Cat:Auctores Neolatini" should eventually be either deleted, or become a supercategory covering "... Renascentiae", "... recentiores" and "...hodierni". All those three are useful; "Neolatini" will perhaps not be useful.
:::If the move that Iacobus and I have suggested is made, then ideally as a second step "Neolatini" should be removed from all pages on which it duplicates "hodierni". Then, as a third step, the remaining instances of "Neolatini" should be
:::I hadn't noticed the redirect. In article space [[Auctores Neolatini]] should ideally be an article on its own, dealing with writers from about 1500 onwards. <font face="Gill Sans">[[Usor:Andrew Dalby|Andrew]]<font color="green">[[Disputatio Usoris:Andrew Dalby| Dalby]]</font></font> 09:50, 23 Martii 2011 (UTC)
| |||