Quantum redactiones paginae "Disputatio:Principia theoriae M" differant
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
Linea 2:
:My original sentence was "Theoria M, in terminologia vulga, notionem..." but it got changed. --[[Usor:Robert.Baruch|Robert.Baruch]] 00:59, 28 Novembris 2010 (UTC)
:Also: ''quae esse? fundamentum? minimum rerum corporum tam diu credita est''... is there a problem with my use of the infinitive + acc. for ''tam dui credita est''? Clearly I'm not so good at Latin yet, so some help would be appreciated :) --[[Usor:Robert.Baruch|Robert.Baruch]] 01:09, 28 Novembris 2010 (UTC)
::(1)well at least in this case the beginning of the clause is indicated by a relative pronoun. What language inserts relative clauses so arbitrarily? or permits multiple predicates slapped together like this? even chinese has a structure to them. The above first sentence is just an example; it is not an exception since more such examples can be found in the body of the text.
::(2) first of all fundamentum minimum rerum corporum = "the smallest foundation of bodies of things"--what is this supposed to mean??
::(3) in "in parte primo" (="in the first half ") the noun and adjective don't agree; "componeri" isn't a word....
::(4) "esse" is ok as part of (A_nom B_nom+esse+creditur = A is believed to be B, both in nominative case (not accusative))--[[Specialis:Conlationes/208.43.160.10|208.43.160.10]] 10:06, 28 Novembris 2010 (UTC)
==Introductio de theoria M==
| |||