Content deleted Content added
Nottingham
No edit summary
Linea 28:
:Eh, I dunno, I think I still disagree with you. But let's let others weigh in and see what the consensus is. (It is true, though, that the "vide etiam" links seemed rather pointless.) --[[Usor:Iustinus|Iustinus]] 20:20 aug 24, 2004 (UTC)
::I apologise that my latin is not good enough to hold a conversation in. It's been ten years since i last did any and I'm trying to learn afresh. Since I have not the ability to write much in the was of sentences, I have been doing housekeeping tasks, reading as I go and learning vocab here and there. Could one of you two please create a link to this discussion so that others may find it easily, and contribute? — [[Usor:Nickshanks|Nicolaus]]
:::I have no idea where to link this for you, sorry. But since you want to do housekeeping tasks, here's one I (for one) would really appreciate: wouldcould you mindadd addingsome images? Specifically, a lot of the unillustrated articles we have here already have ready-made pictures on the English orand other Wikipedias. It's basically just buisybusy-work to transfer them to la:, but I think it will makereally a big difference inimprove the appearence of the articles, if you ask me. --[[Usor:Iustinus|Iustinus]] 16:53 aug 25, 2004 (UTC) ''(ed. 21:34 aug 25, 2004)''
 
 
== Nottingham ==
Line 35 ⟶ 36:
#Burke, Edward W., ''A Hand-List of Latin Place Names with their Modern Equivalents'' gives '''Notingamia''', '''Notinghamia''' and '''Nottinghamium'''.
#[[Carolus Egger|Egger, Karl]] ''Lexicon Nominum Locorum'' gives '''Nottingamia'''
#Martin, Charls ''[www.ipa.net/~magreyn2/recint2.htm+&hl=en&ie=UTF-8 Latin Names of Places in Great Britain and Ireland]'' gives '''Nottingamia'''
No other source I have handy gives a listing. You can, I suppose, take your pick of those. It looks like '''Nottingamia''' is the most common though. --[[Usor:Iustinus|Iustinus]] 21:25 aug 25, 2004 (UTC)