Quantum redactiones paginae "Disputatio:Lingua Slovio" differant

:The assertion that Slovio has a community of users -- in the deletion debate you cite -- is made by IJzeren Jan, the creator of another artificial language ([[Lingua Venedica]]; see also [[Disputatio:Ill Bethisad]]). Not quite neutral, perhaps. I don't think he backed it up with a citation. <font face="Gill Sans">[[Usor:Andrew Dalby|Andrew]]<font color="green">[[Disputatio Usoris:Andrew Dalby| Dalby]]</font></font> 13:54, 29 Martii 2010 (UTC)

::In my opinion, a project with an [http://www.network54.com/Forum/183880/ active forum] and [http://www.google.com/#hl=en&q=Slovio&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=&fp=bcdf8cbbf06dc4f 88 000 Google hits] is notable ''per se'', even if all of this were nothing but a result of a one-man-selfpromotion. Slovianski, a much less notable conlang, does have [[:en:Slovianski|its article]] on enwiki. Also, the interwiki links show that here it is the English Wikipedia who is the odd man out, and we are no way obliged to follow the enwiki decision. Nevertheless, I am in a position similar to that of IJzeren Jan, therefore my opinion easily can qualify as biased. --[[Usor:Gabriel Svoboda|Gabriel Svoboda]] 16:10, 29 Martii 2010 (UTC)