Content deleted Content added
→‎block: nova pars
Linea 1:
Ave, usor ignote! Mos noster est non iniurias contra alios usores dicere, sicut nuper fecisti. Vide [[Vicipaedia:Invitatio]]. Vale! --[[Usor:UV|UV]] 15:31, 26 Septembris 2009 (UTC)
#REDIRECT [[Usor nequam]]
:Ave. Ut tu debes scire, solum oportet formulam "tiro" uti cum ipse impones in pagina quam scribes. Si latinitatem paginae cuiusdam dubites, utere formulam "latinitas" gradu minore dando. Gratias.--[[Usor:Rafaelgarcia|Rafaelgarcia]] 23:47, 3 Novembris 2009 (UTC)
==De Hierosolimis==
Salve, usor ignote. Fortasse a Consociatione Nationum Hierosolyma non agnoscuntur, sed de facto sunt urbs Israelis --<font color="blue">[[:la:usor:Xaverius|Xave]]</font><font color="green">[[:eu:Lankide:Xaverius|ri]]</font><font color="red">[[:eu:Lankide_eztabaida:Xaverius|us]]</font> 19:36, 16 Novembris 2009 (UTC)
:Iterum salve. Iam non reverti mutationem recentissimam tuam, sed te moneo, in ho modo non categorias deleas. Hyerosolima sunt etiam in Israele.--<font color="blue">[[:la:usor:Xaverius|Xave]]</font><font color="green">[[:eu:Lankide:Xaverius|ri]]</font><font color="red">[[:eu:Lankide_eztabaida:Xaverius|us]]</font> 08:40, 17 Novembris 2009 (UTC)
::Secundum quem, te rogo? Secundum Zionistas modo et socios eorum, at non secundum Nationes Unitas.
:::Paginam protegi pro tempore quia inutile est bellum gerere categoriarum.
:::Nobis necesse est quomodo res se habent (et habuerunt) scribere; possumus et addere de rebus quas vult Nationes Unitae aliique homines. Possumus igitur de statu Hierosolymae pleniter scribere in pagina ipsa (et, si necesse sit, in pagina disputationis). Conventum aperi: nobis adiuva! <font face="Gill Sans">[[Usor:Andrew Dalby|Andrew]]<font color="green">[[Disputatio Usoris:Andrew Dalby| Dalby]]</font></font> 16:10, 17 Novembris 2009 (UTC)
 
==Iterum==
Iterum salve, usor ignote. Usor alius mutationem nefastam tuam apud [[Gandalf]] revertit. Bis fecisti hanc mutationem, et bis revertimus, si ter facias egomet te obstruam.--<font color="blue">[[:la:usor:Xaverius|Xave]]</font><font color="green">[[:eu:Lankide:Xaverius|ri]]</font><font color="red">[[:eu:Lankide_eztabaida:Xaverius|us]]</font> 15:03, 16 Februarii 2010 (UTC)
:Ut dixi, nunc ago. Obstructus es.--<font color="blue">[[:la:usor:Xaverius|Xave]]</font><font color="green">[[:eu:Lankide:Xaverius|ri]]</font><font color="red">[[:eu:Lankide_eztabaida:Xaverius|us]]</font> 15:35, 9 Martii 2010 (UTC)
 
== De Ex(s)uperio ==
Vide, s.t.p., [[Disputatio:Exsuperius (episcopus Tolosanus)]]. <font face="Gill Sans">[[Usor:Andrew Dalby|Andrew]]<font color="green">[[Disputatio Usoris:Andrew Dalby| Dalby]]</font></font> 17:03, 20 Martii 2010 (UTC)
 
==de scriptura==
I blocked you ''and'' Pantocrator for a couple of hours. Sorry, but you both contributed to the crossing of the impoliteness threshold. But thanks for the immediate improvement to [[Scriptura]]. I hadn't met John Roman before. <font face="Gill Sans">[[Usor:Andrew Dalby|Andrew]]<font color="green">[[Disputatio Usoris:Andrew Dalby| Dalby]]</font></font> 21:54, 20 Martii 2010 (UTC)::
:It was just a very rapid translation of the Simple English article - which isn't much good itself.
::Well the Ciceroism was at least grammatical. Modus is masculine, so per modum visualem. Oculorum still probably better. --[[Usor:Ioscius|Ioscius]] <sup>'''[[Disputatio Usoris:Ioscius|∞]]'''</sup> 15:04, 21 Martii 2010 (UTC)
:::oops, yes, careless. But, by means of eyes? An adjective is generall to be preferred to a genitive in Latin
::::For ''visual'' in particular, the genitive is evidently to be preferred. Merriam-Webster characterizes ''visualis'' as "Late Latin." ¶ Maybe an earlier author's ''modus'' isn't the best word, and something like ''usus'' would be better—or some altogether different idiom, like Ainsworth's (eighteenth-century) suggestion, ''ad visionem pertinens.'' [[Usor:IacobusAmor|IacobusAmor]] 19:57, 21 Martii 2010 (UTC)
:::::Can we just write Latin, and stop trying to be twee?
::::::Utinam nobis significationem "twee" communices... --[[Usor:Ioscius|Ioscius]] <sup>'''[[Disputatio Usoris:Ioscius|∞]]'''</sup> 21:06, 21 Martii 2010 (UTC)
:::::::It's an insult, Iosce, but it doesn't work on Americans. :) [[Usor:IacobusAmor|IacobusAmor]] 22:27, 21 Martii 2010 (UTC)
::::::::And I's a told y'all before, I ain't even learnt to talk like one of them northern good speakers, let alone whatever the twee our anonymous (apparently) British friend has in mind... Nihilominus petiit is ut scribamus Latine =] --[[Usor:Ioscius|Ioscius]] <sup>'''[[Disputatio Usoris:Ioscius|∞]]'''</sup> 22:33, 21 Martii 2010 (UTC)
 
== block ==
 
As much as I agree with you, you can't be so rude about it. See you in a week.
 
--[[Usor:Ioscius|Ioscius]] <sup>'''[[Disputatio Usoris:Ioscius|∞]]'''</sup> 06:49, 23 Martii 2010 (UTC)