Quantum redactiones paginae "Vicipaedia:Taberna/Tabularium 14" differant

Content deleted Content added
Linea 817:
The period from the 11-19c. comprises the great majority of all Latin texts available today - are we to pretend it didn't happen, and pass right from the classics to the 20th-century 'living Latin' revival? [[Usor:Pantocrator|Pantocrator]] 09:19, 21 Februarii 2010 (UTC)
:If the New Latin that you're defending involves an up-to-date vocabulary expressed in classical grammar, most modern readers won't object; but if you're defending the grammatical innovations of the Middle Ages (rejected by Latinists of the Renaissance), you'll meet strong opposition. All of this has been discussed before, at length. ¶ As to the classical style in general: that's been the ideal of pedagogy for hundreds of years, and it extends to the vocabulary: Bradley's Arnold tells English-speaking students to call bullets ''sagittae'' and Parliament the ''Senatus.'' [[Usor:IacobusAmor|IacobusAmor]] 12:52, 21 Februarii 2010 (UTC)
::Iacobe, certe sagittae et senatus grammaticae classicae exempla vix sunt, sed conatus ad vocabularium purgendum. Respectu legibus moribusque hodiernis sagitta a glande plumbea multis modis decerni potest, et quidem parlamentum a senatu.--[[Specialis:Conlationes/24.183.186.151|24.183.186.151]] 13:06, 21 Februarii 2010 (UTC)
 
== Conversio populi "Eskimo" ==