Praepositiones (a prae + ponere) et postpositiones (a post + ponere), una appositiones[1][2] appellatae,[3] sunt copia vocabularum quae cognationes spatiales vel temporales implicant (in, sub, ad, ante), vel varias personas semanticas agunt (de, pro).[4] Praepositio vel postpositio plerumque cum nomine substantivo vel pronomine coniungitur, vel generalius cum locutione nominali, quod appellatur eius complementum, vel aliquando eius obiectum. Praepositio complementum antecedit; postpositio sequitur.

Nexus interni

  1. Et adpositiones.
  2.   Fons nominis Latini desideratur (addito fonte, hanc formulam remove)
  3. Huddleston et Pullum 2002:602.
  4. Huddleston et Pullum 2002, capitulo 7.

Bibliographia

recensere
  • Bennett, David C. 1975. Spatial and Temporal Uses of English Prepositions: An Essay in Stratificational Semantics. Londinii: Longman.
  • Emonds, Joseph E. 1985. A Unified Theory of Syntactic Categories. Dordrecht: Foris.
  • Haspelmath, Martin. 2003. Adpositions. International Encyclopedia of Linguistics. Ed. 2a. Novi Eboraci: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0195139771.
  • Hernandez, Mark L. 2001. The power of the letter. ISBN 9780534420666.
  • Huddleston, Rodney, et Geoffrey K. Pullum. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cantabrigiae: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0521431468.
  • Huddleston, Rodney, et Geoffrey K. Pullum. 2005. A Student's Introduction to English Grammar. Cantabrigiae: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9780521612883. Google Boooks.
  • Jackendoff, Ray S. 1973. Base Rules for PPs. In A Festschrift for Morris Halle, ed. S. R. Anderson et P. Kiparsky, 345–356. Novi Eboraci: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
  • Koopman, Hilda. 2000. Prepositions, postpositions, circumpositions, and particles. The Syntax of Specifiers and Heads, 204–260. Londinii: Routledge.
  • Libert, Alan R. 2006. Ambipositions. LINCOM studies in language typology, 13). LINCOM. ISBN 3895867470.
  • Maling, Joan. 1983. Transitive adjectives: A case of categorial reanalysis. Linguistic Categories: Auxiliaries and Related Puzzles, ed. F. Heny et B. Richards, 1:253–289. Dordrecht: Reidel.
  • Melis, Ludo. 2003. La préposition en français' Gap: Ophrys.
  • Pullum, Geoffrey K. 2005. Phrasal Prepositions in a Civil Tone. Language Log.
  • Quirk, Randolph, et Joan Mulholland. 1964. Complex Prepositions and Related Sequences. English Studies, suppl. vol. 45:64–73.
  • Rauh, Gisa. 1991. Approaches to Prepositions. Tubingae: Gunter Narr.
  • Reindl, Donald F. 2001. Areal Effects on the Preservation and Genesis of Slavic Postpositions. On Prepositions, ed. Lj. Šarić et D. F. Reindl, 85–100. Studia Slavica Oldenburgensia, 8. Oldenburgi: Carl-von-Ossietzky-Universitat Oldenburg.
  • Thatcher, David. 2014. ''Saving Our Prepositions: A Guide for the Perplexed.
  • Woodcock, E. C. 1959. A New Latin Syntxa. Londinii: Bristol Classical Press. ISBN 0862920426.

Nexus externi

recensere