Disputatio:Venus (planeta)
Latest comment: abhinc 2 annos by Andrew Dalby in topic Points at Meta
Fontes recensere
Haec res melius est et informationes plurimas habet, sed fontes ad informationes non habet. Sed nuper addebam. Bonis salutationibus, Donatello (disputatio) 21:44, 26 Aprilis 2012 (UTC).
Points at Meta recensere
Frontfrog, your changes to this article today (useful though they may be) will cost Vicipaedia 0.05 points in the 1000-article list at Meta because you've pushed text below the 30,000 cutoff. Any chance you could add at least 600 characters to nudge it back above that level? IacobusAmor (disputatio) 13:34, 23 Novembris 2021 (UTC)
- Iacobus speaks truth, but the edit was a good one because local infoboxes are deprecated, especially when they can be replaced with a Wikidata infobox. Full bibliographies are not deprecated, quite the opposite, so adding good material to the bibliography would be an excellent way to please everyone. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 13:49, 23 Novembris 2021 (UTC)
- I'm sorry for my change but it was good to update infobox as for me. Frontfrog (disputatio) 08:36, 25 Novembris 2021 (UTC)
- It was indeed a useful change, and it may have been good for you, but it was possibly bad for the rest of us, in that it reduced the perceived quality of Vicipaedia as judged by the quantitative standards at Meta. A paradox?! IacobusAmor (disputatio) 14:34, 25 Novembris 2021 (UTC)
- No, Iacobe, "bad for the rest of us" is a wild overstatement. We are judged by footfall (or clicks). If people come, and like what they see enough to stay, and like it so much that they come back again, we are doing well. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 18:51, 25 Novembris 2021 (UTC)
- It was indeed a useful change, and it may have been good for you, but it was possibly bad for the rest of us, in that it reduced the perceived quality of Vicipaedia as judged by the quantitative standards at Meta. A paradox?! IacobusAmor (disputatio) 14:34, 25 Novembris 2021 (UTC)
- Anyway, it would be good if we make this article as month article in the future. Frontfrog (disputatio) 08:36, 25 Novembris 2021 (UTC)
- Maybe we need to rewrite some sections? Frontfrog (disputatio) 10:23, 25 Novembris 2021 (UTC)
- Both good ideas. I added some text about the names "Venus" etc., and Iacobus has already enlarged the bibliography, so the crisis has been managed :) Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 14:47, 25 Novembris 2021 (UTC)
- Maybe we need to rewrite some sections? Frontfrog (disputatio) 10:23, 25 Novembris 2021 (UTC)
- I'm sorry for my change but it was good to update infobox as for me. Frontfrog (disputatio) 08:36, 25 Novembris 2021 (UTC)