Disputatio:Systema numericum binarium

Latest comment: abhinc 18 annos by Ioshus Rocchio in topic Rightmost

Rightmost recensere

I'm not sure you can use dexter that way. The longer turn of phrase is more correct, but perhaps too clunky. Perhaps a compromise could be reached with digitus maxime a dextro or something like that. Traditinal grammars frown on using prepositional phrases as adjectives, but the Romans did not always observe that rule. I usually feel free to break it. Even if one can use dexter that way, the superlative would presumably be dexterrimus. --Iustinus 18:20, 24 Ianuarii 2006 (UTC)Reply

I find examples of both stems, dextrius is certainly the comparative, but I find dextrissimus and dexterrimus. I don't mind a compromise, but the longer turn of phrase is, as you said, too clunky, certainly a version can be reached that is grammarically accurate, and aesthetically more pleasingly. Maxime a dextro is fine, but I still think dextrissimus/dexterrimus works, too.--Ioshus Rocchio 18:57, 24 Ianuarii 2006 (UTC)Reply
Apud Sallustium et Varronem invenies formam dextimus vel dextumus, quae mea sententia inde potius adhibenda sit. W. B. 9 Kal Febr. 2006 21.36 UTC
On those lines, dextrissumus ought to work, too. Seriously, the language was spoken for a bunch of hundred years. Compare American English today with the language in which the constitution was written. 200 years, a fraction of the time Latin was spoken, can certainly wreak extensive havoc on a language. Many forms are "correct," especially in such ancient constructions as compartives.--Ioshus Rocchio 19:05, 25 Ianuarii 2006 (UTC)Reply
Revertere ad "Systema numericum binarium".