Haec symbola nihil de Wik.Anglica mutuata est recensere

"Haec symbola nihil de Wik.Anglica mutuata est, quae multa continet ad rem ipsam haud pertinentia"—Nihil? If James Whitcomb Riley first (or most famously) formulated the phrase (hence the title of this article), why shouldn't he be cited in the references or the bibliography? IacobusAmor 17:42, 25 Septembris 2009 (UTC)Reply

Well, because Riley was hardly describing the kind of epistemic logic that underlies his utterance. If I'm wrong, please, insert his work in the bibliography. I supplied Davis as a suitable reference. --Neander 19:33, 25 Septembris 2009 (UTC)Reply
Revertere ad "Examen anatinum".