Disputatio:Cyrillus et Methodius

Active discussions

Thanks, Alex! I've been meaning to write this article for months now, saved me the trouble ;]. I think however, the evelopment of the cyrillic alphabet deserves more than the one line treatment it gets here...I took a whole course on Kiril and Mefodius, so I would be glad to add on once you have finished initial edits.--Ioshus Rocchio 13:04, 24 Maii 2006 (UTC)

Multas gratias pro correctionibus!
Well, I think of writing separate articles on the Glagolitic (how do you like "abecedarium Glagoliticum" as the Latin name for it?) and Cyrillic alphabets, where more information could be given. -- Alexander Gerascenco 15:25, 24 Maii 2006 (UTC)

Sic, abecedarium Glagoliticum nomen recte est.--Ioshus Rocchio 18:33, 24 Maii 2006 (UTC)


using this as a future imperative?

I meant this opinion's being possibly obsolete ("praeteritus,a,um" - "прошедший, прошлый" - "past"). But I'm not sure this word is the one to be used in this context. Possibly, "priscus" would be better in this case? -- Alexander Gerascenco 15:25, 24 Maii 2006 (UTC)
Ah, ponimaju...da "priscus" budet luchee.--Ioshus Rocchio 17:42, 24 Maii 2006 (UTC)


What does "iis" mean, Dimitar?--Ioshus (disp) 17:46, 6 Decembris 2006 (UTC)

Third person pronoun, dative plural. Dative of possesion essentially. --Iustinus 18:06, 6 Decembris 2006 (UTC)
Of course! There are two brothers, not just one! Stultus sum...--Ioshus (disp) 18:08, 6 Decembris 2006 (UTC)
Revertere ad "Cyrillus et Methodius".