Disputatio Categoriae:Nomina
Latest comment: abhinc 15 annos by Andrew Dalby in topic Nomen categoriae
Nomen categoriae recensere
I think nearly all the pages in this category should be in Categoria:Praenomina. With the exception of Ennius and one or two others, these are not nomina. Or am I wrong? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 21:13, 5 Aprilis 2008 (UTC)
- Can we ask UVbot to do it? Or will someone have to do it manually? Harrissimo 21:21, 5 Aprilis 2008 (UTC).
- Yes, if we agree, I think UV could do it easily. The bot would move them all, then I could manually replace the very few that are really about nomina. In fact, Ennius and a few others should be in two categories; they are Roman nomina which are now used (in Italy, Portugal, etc.) as praenomina. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 08:57, 6 Aprilis 2008 (UTC)
- No one has objected so I will ask UV's bot to make this move. If no one else does it first I promise to add manually to Categoria:Nomina the few pages that should remain in this category or should be in both. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 17:23, 6 Maii 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, if we agree, I think UV could do it easily. The bot would move them all, then I could manually replace the very few that are really about nomina. In fact, Ennius and a few others should be in two categories; they are Roman nomina which are now used (in Italy, Portugal, etc.) as praenomina. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 08:57, 6 Aprilis 2008 (UTC)