Disputatio:Sejong
Latest comment: abhinc 13 annos by Andrew Dalby in topic Let's not do "Magnus"es
Let's not do "Magnus"es recensere
I'll remove the "Magnus" for the time being. If anyone is really cross, the first thing to do is to find a reliable Latin source in which he is called "Magnus"; then we could put it back.
The apparent footnote reference seems meaningless. I took it out. If a reference was intended to something real, I suggest adding a link.
The category "Rex Coreae" was badly formed. We use plurals in category names, and we prefer a category to have at least four members. I've deleted that too, but as soon as we have pages for a couple more Korean kings, it can be re-created as "Reges Coreae".
I'll translate all the above into Latin if anyone doesn't understand it :) Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:59, 11 Ianuarii 2011 (UTC)
- We'll follow your lead.--Jondel 14:01, 11 Ianuarii 2011 (UTC)
- Secundum en, aptissimus commentarius est "List of monarchs of Korea," et categoriae accommodatae sunt "Korean royalty, "Korean rulers," "Lists of Korean people," et "Lists of monarchs," sed non "Korean kings." ¶ In commentario de abecedario Coreano, quis est Sejong Magnus Joseon? IacobusAmor 14:09, 11 Ianuarii 2011 (UTC)