Disputatio:Quousque tandem abutere, Catilina, patientia nostra?

Ehu! Praeclarae orationis prima verba nunc habemus! Bene fecisti. Inter cetera, etiam paginam de Catone Censore vidi magna cum voluptate. Perge quo coepisti, Alexander! Vale. --Poecus 14:15, 28 Maii 2009 (UTC)

Poecu, quam prosperum te invenire in disputatione huius paginae! Tibi gratias reddo quia vidisti paginam de Catone Censore, quem uti scis permagni habeo! Ave ac vale!--Alexander Gelsumis 18:42, 28 Maii 2009 (UTC)

Coniunctio?

Shouldn't this be merged into In Catilinam, at least until there's enough material to justify a separate article for each oration? Lesgles (disputatio) 17:26, 20 Iunii 2013 (UTC)

I see your point. However, a quick and dirty Google search suggests that this is a real "locutio", recently adapted for use against Berlusconi, Putin, "Hollanda" and Obama. We will need to cite at least some of those uses, if they are citable, in order to justify keeping this page. Any other views? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 17:40, 20 Iunii 2013 (UTC)

Yes, it's an often parodied locutio. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 23:36, 20 Iunii 2013 (UTC)

Right, it makes sense then, I guess. It definitely needs expansion though, since really only the last sentence deals with it as a locutio. We should probably have one on O tempora, o mores! too. Lesgles (disputatio) 00:00, 21 Iunii 2013 (UTC)

Yes, indeed! IacobusAmor (disputatio) 00:19, 21 Iunii 2013 (UTC)

We do now! A. Mahoney (disputatio) 21:55, 21 Iunii 2013 (UTC)

Macte virtute! Lesgles (disputatio) 22:06, 21 Iunii 2013 (UTC)

I found another example, medieval this time, page 56 line 12. I'll revise the article tomorrow, I hope. 20:18, 13 Augusti 2013 (UTC)