Disputatio:Cantiliacum
Latest comment: abhinc 10 annos by Andrew Dalby in topic Nomen
Pagina huic coniuncta e conversione paginae “Chantilly (Oise)” sitūs fr.wikipedia.org orta est.
Auctoribus illius paginae hic enumeratis gratias agimus.
Aquesta pàgina es basa en una traducció de „Chantilly (Oise)“ a fr.wikipedia.org. Podeu trobar la llista d'editors aquí.
Die angegliederte Seite basiert ursprünglich auf einer Übersetzung von „Chantilly (Oise)“ aus fr.wikipedia.org. Eine Liste der Autoren ist hier verfügbar.
The attached page originated as a translation from the page “Chantilly (Oise)” on the site fr.wikipedia.org.
We are grateful to the authors of that page as listed here.
We are grateful to the authors of that page as listed here.
La apuda paĝo origine baziĝas sur traduko de “Chantilly (Oise)” el fr.wikipedia.org. Listo de la ĝentilaj artikolverkintoj haveblas ĉi tie.
Nomen recensere
I think the move to Chantiliacum was pointless. That form is certainly found, but "Cantiliacum" is found too, perhaps particularly in French sources, and it agrees better with French linguistic history (hence e.g. this name is used as an example in Nyrop's Grammaire historique). The move impelled me to add citations, which is of course a Good Thing :)
- Oh, yes, and while searching I found a Latin form for "Condé", which I had wanted earlier and couldn't verify. That's a good thing too! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 13:58, 19 Ianuarii 2014 (UTC)